December 4, 2009
BtoB Online
Demandbase Professional for Publishers Debuts

December 1, 2009
DemandGen Report
Leading Demand Gen Solution Providers Connect To Form “The Marketing Cloud”

November, 2009
DestinationCRM
Climbing to New Heights of Lead Generation

November, 2009
Harvard Business Review
Paths to Revenue: Mid-Market CEOs Share Best Practices

October 12, 2009
DemandGen Report
Demandbase Adds Analytics To Provide Deeper Insights Into Lead Sources, Behavior

October 6, 2009
BtoB Online
Demandbase Enhances Customer Acquisition Solution

September, 2009
Business Week
To Generate Sales Leads, Develop an Inbound Marketing Strategy

Demandbase In the News

Jason Stewart

Mr. Stewart leads demand generation programs for Demandbase and is a recognized thought leader in the B2B lead generation and lead management space. He founded and leads the Salesforce.com user group in Salesforce.com’s headquarters location (San Francisco) and was one of the first 500 people to complete the Salesforce.com Certified Administrator process. He has spent 10+ years in B2B telesales, demand generation, lead management and marketing operations with a variety of businesses including Maxager Technology, MarketLive, and Inference Corporation. Mr. Stewart has advised emerging software companies including Spoke and Kieden (acquired by Salesforce.com). He earned his BA in English from Rutgers University.

View Jason Stewart's profile on LinkedIn


Chris Golec

Mr. Golec is CEO of Demandbase – a provider of On Demand Software and Services to improve demand generation at B2B companies. Prior to founding the company in 2005, he co-founded Supplybase in the mid-90’s. Supplybase was a successful supply chain software company that created significant customer value before being acquired by i2 Technologies in 2000 as part of the largest software merger in history. Before entering the software industry, Mr. Golec spent the previous 10 years of his career with GM, DuPont, and GE serving in engineering, sales and marketing roles. He holds a B.S. in Chemical Engineering and an M.B.A.

« January 2008 | Main | March 2008 »

How to Get Your Ideas Across, Side Two (Part One)

By Jason Stewart  - February 28, 2008

Continuing my Education in Business Communication, Circa 1970

I came across an old record album from 1970 this past December … A Nations Business ‘Executive Seminar in Sound’ – How to Get Your Ideas Across. I listened to side one last month, and still remain intrigued by how much things stay the same in the face of tremendous change.

How to Get Your Ideas Across

Borrowing my description from last time, the recording focuses on how to best communicate your ideas at work in order to “win friends and influence people.” It features the general bullet-pointed highlights of each “lesson" on the back cover of the record, with the actual recording featuring a narrator hammering the points home in between skits and vignettes demonstrating the theme of the track. Here’s my take on the first half of side two:

Band Five: The Successful Negative
Scene - A diligent and conscientious employee is repeatedly frustrated by his boss’s wishy-washy responses to his proposals. Ultimately, it becomes clear that the best kind of boss is one who can firmly say no without crushing the spirit out of his employees. Here’s how NOT to say “no,” from the back cover of the album:

  • Don't feed false hopes with the procrastination answer (ie “maybe next quarter”) 
  • No beating around the bush
  •  
  • No passing the buck, or blaming someone else for the “no”
  •  
  • Avoid the apologetic “no” which holds out hope for a “yes”

Positive approaches to saying "no"

  • Say it, THEN explain it   
  •  
  • Maintain interest in the idea by finding other channels to use it
  •  
  • Give realistic encouragement to keep trying

This track actually made me think of how I deal with vendors that approach me, and how honesty really is the best policy. Rather than push them off a few months at a time with a “we’ll see” response I tell them exactly why I am not interested in their offer. I have found that many of them actually come up with creative offerings that fit my needs, or come back to me first when something changes that is more in line with my interests. This can be an advantage when you are booking advertising or email list rentals.

I get treated better because I don’t waste their time. 

Band Six: Tons of Words on Oceans of Paper
Scene -  A corporate lunch room where two unacquainted worker bees sit next to one another. Worker number one comments how worker number two seems out of sorts, to which number two replies that he is swamped with paperwork and doesn't know how to catch a break. Number one says that number two should "...do what I do, and send it all to some guy named Kraddick in finance." Number two replies ... wait for it  ... that HE is Kraddick from finance! Play predictable sound effect now.

Aside from the hilarity, the track goes on to offer some very good, albeit dated advice on how to avoid drowning in your correspondence: 

  • Thinking on paper is a useful aid but a poor way of getting your ideas across 
  •  
  • Not every letter needs to be answered
  •  
  • Find the simplest way to reach people with a message
  •  
  • Don’t write a personal letter if a form letter will get the job done
  •  
  • Develop writing skills for your job, but use professionals when needed

I say that the scenes are dated because they talk about printed memos and business letters and corporate message boards - the kind that hang on the wall with pieces of paper hanging from them. I know! Crazy! It even mentions placing a “mimeographed slip in a pay envelope" which is dated on SO many levels in this age of printer/scanner/copier/fax machines and direct deposit. I had to check wikipedia to refresh my memory on a few items.

The "thinking on paper" bit refers to how so much of the correspondence we receive (or, dare I say it, marketing collateral we read in our email or online) could be trimmed down to a fraction of its size with little to no impact on the hard content of the piece. People have a tendency to ramble in their writing as if they were "thinking out loud," which can be dangerous as well as just plain boring. I also like the bit about not needing to answer every correspondence, and asking yourself "what will be accomplished by replying to this?"

Selecting the medium for your message can also be challenging for, for both marketers as well as for internal communications. Email is great, but how many times have you found that people just didn't read that extremely well crafted and exhaustive email you circulated...you know, the one that answers all the questions they are asking you now, face to face?

Don't ever assume that a simple email campaign or note to your colleagues is going to solve all your problems. Consider "throwback" methods like picking up a phone, direct mail or faxing a letter to a prospect or colleague every once in a while.

And They Told Two Friends...

By Jason Stewart - February 20, 2008

Customer Support and Marketing, Replacing Sales and Marketing as Your Dynamic Duo

I've heard it said that if you have a bad experience, you are likely to tell three people about it - but if you have a good one you might tell one person. Is it because people just like to complain? I'm not sure, but I do know that one of the things I like about Seth Godin is that he goes out of his way to acknowledge good customer service. Why does he do that in a marketing blog? Because word of mouth is the best form of marketing, and if the saying is true you need to impress three people to offset the damage for every one person you disappoint.

Here are two of my recent customer experiences...

I flew on Virgin America last week. Absolutely fantastic. It was the first time in close to a decade that I felt like the guest of an airline instead of a package to be delivered from point A to point B. They seemed genuinely happy and appreciative that I selected them as my provider for this trip. 'Nuff said.

Part two was not necessarily a bad experience, but left me a bit puzzled. I called Salesforce.com's technical support to answer a question I had about using formulas in custom fields. I have a formula in place for my marketing campaigns that calculates cost per customer. It reads:

IF( NumberOfWonOpportunities = 0, ActualCost , ActualCost / NumberOfWonOpportunities)

Rather than just the obvious "ActualCost / NumberOfWonOpportunities" it reads this way so that if it is a new campaign, and there are no "closed/won" opportunities yet, the field does not read "#ERR" in my reports. The problem is that now, if the campaign is in the planning stages or there are no "closed/won" opportunities it says that the cost per customer is the same as the actual cost.

For example, let's say I am planning an event and the actual cost of the event is $10,000. As of right now, since the event is in the planning stages there are no "closed/won" opportunities yet. In other words...no customers. Yet the field reads that my cost per customer is $10,000 even though I have no customers yet.

My question was, is there some way to tweak the formula to leave the field blank, or maybe insert "not applicable" as the value of the field if there are no customers yet?

The response I got from customer support at SFDC (after holding for a few minutes) was that "basic support does not deal with formulas" and that it might be a good idea to post on one of the forums and "hope one of our developers might respond."

SFDC gets big points for making the phone number for support easy to find, while still making all the other options like "log a case" and "search the knowledge base" very obvious. It is always amazing to me how hard it is to find a phone number on some websites, including the phone company! And I should absolutely note that typically I have had nothing but good experiences dealing with SFDC tech support. It's just that this response was so uncharacteristically unhelpful I wanted to share. I need to either pay for VIP support, or post on a forum and hope for the best. How odd is that?

And I still don't know if it is even possible to write the formula that way. It might be obvious to many of you formula or query gurus out there...if so, please shoot me a note or comment at the bottom of the blog.

Or at least point me to a forum I might be able to get an answer from.

Update: I think I found the formula...

IF( NumberOfWonOpportunities > 0, ActualCost / NumberOfWonOpportunities, null)